Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Charts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Gold Prospecting
Prospecting Rules & Regulations
Victorian Government Response to Victorian Environmental Assessment Councils (VEAC) Investigation into additional prospecting areas in parks
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Prospecting Australia:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RottenRon" data-source="post: 56395" data-attributes="member: 174"><p>G'day mate.</p><p></p><p>I wasn't really suggesting a "new committee" as such, more like suggesting it would take a group of people, (within the PMAV as you suggest maybe) to do the ground work.</p><p></p><p>I'm also fully aware that even with my limited calls to the PMAV in the last week or so, they need all the support and help they can get. This idea I've raised is nothing more than an idea at this stage. Some discussion would need to take place to nut out the merits and pitfalls, then make an educated decision rather than a rash one.</p><p></p><p>Look, if this subject doesn't get enough interest from members, then the question has to be asked, is it worth the effort? Personally, I think it is. It will be too late when we get restricted that much, that we'll be lucky to have access to any viable creeks etc</p><p></p><p>By the way. All the rivers shown as Heritage on the "recommended" area maps, appear to come under the Heritage River Act 1992, Schedules 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, Unfortunately, the Act is as clear as mud, and reference has to be made to maps held in the Central Plan Office which is in the Department of Sustainability and Environment.</p><p></p><p>Bureaucracy certainly hasn't made it easy for us.</p><p></p><p>I'd be very pleased to hear other peoples thoughts on the subject, but please take the time to read all the posts thus far.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RottenRon, post: 56395, member: 174"] G'day mate. I wasn't really suggesting a "new committee" as such, more like suggesting it would take a group of people, (within the PMAV as you suggest maybe) to do the ground work. I'm also fully aware that even with my limited calls to the PMAV in the last week or so, they need all the support and help they can get. This idea I've raised is nothing more than an idea at this stage. Some discussion would need to take place to nut out the merits and pitfalls, then make an educated decision rather than a rash one. Look, if this subject doesn't get enough interest from members, then the question has to be asked, is it worth the effort? Personally, I think it is. It will be too late when we get restricted that much, that we'll be lucky to have access to any viable creeks etc By the way. All the rivers shown as Heritage on the "recommended" area maps, appear to come under the Heritage River Act 1992, Schedules 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, Unfortunately, the Act is as clear as mud, and reference has to be made to maps held in the Central Plan Office which is in the Department of Sustainability and Environment. Bureaucracy certainly hasn't made it easy for us. I'd be very pleased to hear other peoples thoughts on the subject, but please take the time to read all the posts thus far. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Gold Prospecting
Prospecting Rules & Regulations
Victorian Government Response to Victorian Environmental Assessment Councils (VEAC) Investigation into additional prospecting areas in parks
Top