Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Charts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Gold Prospecting
Metal Detecting for Gold
Undetectable Gold (with GPX & Evo coil)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Prospecting Australia:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="22shells" data-source="post: 294668" data-attributes="member: 3817"><p>I've also noticed that the SDC is better at finding speccies than the 5000. SDC is just turn on and go while the 5000 has many adjustable settings- none of which can match the SDC. (Although the 5000 has more depth on solid nuggets). If it's the technology used being the limiting factor, then the SDC has MPF (multi period fast) and the 5000 has MPS (multi period sensing) as well as DVT and SETA. So then it would seem to be that MPF is better at finding prickly speccies than MPS? So why not then incorporate MPF technology into the 5000 and call it the GPX 6000? Would the weight be too much? Biggest drawback with VLF's is that you'll end up with a pocketfull of "hotrocks" at the end of the day.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="22shells, post: 294668, member: 3817"] I've also noticed that the SDC is better at finding speccies than the 5000. SDC is just turn on and go while the 5000 has many adjustable settings- none of which can match the SDC. (Although the 5000 has more depth on solid nuggets). If it's the technology used being the limiting factor, then the SDC has MPF (multi period fast) and the 5000 has MPS (multi period sensing) as well as DVT and SETA. So then it would seem to be that MPF is better at finding prickly speccies than MPS? So why not then incorporate MPF technology into the 5000 and call it the GPX 6000? Would the weight be too much? Biggest drawback with VLF's is that you'll end up with a pocketfull of "hotrocks" at the end of the day. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Gold Prospecting
Metal Detecting for Gold
Undetectable Gold (with GPX & Evo coil)
Top