Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Charts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Gold Prospecting
Prospecting Rules & Regulations
Petition to stop the proposed ban on sluicing in Victoria
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Prospecting Australia:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Goldtarget" data-source="post: 82867" data-attributes="member: 2152"><p>Hey gcause its actually the VNPA, Victorian National Parks Association, a lobby group for NP use, this is there submission and stance to the report as stakeholders</p><p>As opposed to the VEAC that you have assigned it to, and so nobody gets confused are the group it was submitted to for review in determining its findings that were passed onto the Victorian government. </p><p></p><p>Other than that I think its fantastic. Perhaps steering away from the Phytophthora angle is to be advised, instead go down the noxious weed (blackberries etc) path that we are proactive. If you head down that path of acknowledging then its a slippery slope. All they can tell you is it exists, not where our how it got there. Green leaning gross use this sort of misinformation no fault claims to vilify people who may actually be completely innocent. Will we ban magpies because they put their beak in to feed? Or wombats who want to make a home are they banned? See the line I'm heading down. Better to get on the front foot.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Goldtarget, post: 82867, member: 2152"] Hey gcause its actually the VNPA, Victorian National Parks Association, a lobby group for NP use, this is there submission and stance to the report as stakeholders As opposed to the VEAC that you have assigned it to, and so nobody gets confused are the group it was submitted to for review in determining its findings that were passed onto the Victorian government. Other than that I think its fantastic. Perhaps steering away from the Phytophthora angle is to be advised, instead go down the noxious weed (blackberries etc) path that we are proactive. If you head down that path of acknowledging then its a slippery slope. All they can tell you is it exists, not where our how it got there. Green leaning gross use this sort of misinformation no fault claims to vilify people who may actually be completely innocent. Will we ban magpies because they put their beak in to feed? Or wombats who want to make a home are they banned? See the line I'm heading down. Better to get on the front foot. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Gold Prospecting
Prospecting Rules & Regulations
Petition to stop the proposed ban on sluicing in Victoria
Top