Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Charts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Gold Prospecting
Prospecting Rules & Regulations
NSW Highbanking Illegal ..... so what is a Highbanker and Highbanking?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Prospecting Australia:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Goldtarget" data-source="post: 358970" data-attributes="member: 2152"><p>There's a well known report that states dredging on small scale actually <em>increased</em> the numbers of crustaceans and <em>increased</em> the available food supply to the food chain in a study into dredging conducted in the USA. Conveniently that sort of information is dismissed when conducting an environmental review, along with many other tactics such as flood and storm damage labeled as man made, and reporting of protected species sightings in areas that the species does not occupy. Both tactics were employed by the crazy green groups calling themselves "environmentalists" during the period leading up to the decision of a large box ironbark park submission. To be exact at least 4, and perhaps more than a dozen hairy nose wombats were released into the area and reported as native to the area. Those wombats would have suffered horrible deaths, dying of starvation, dehydration or both. It doesn't take too many brains to figure out how they got there, and that they are not natives to the area. Who has ever heard of a wombat digging holes in ground like concrete, or grazing on eucalyptus leaves and bush shrubs? Noone because they couldn't possibly survive in that area. Yet there it was in the submission, multiple individual animals that would be at risk from timber cutting, vegetation removal, and vehicles in the area. Next they'll be telling me they died of turbidity in the water course.</p><p></p><p>Hardly surprising then if submissions contrary to the proposed agenda are targeted to never see the light of day when any and all tactics are used. I actually believe there is little sense in trying to negotiate with them. The surest way home is to go directly to the politician responsible.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Goldtarget, post: 358970, member: 2152"] There's a well known report that states dredging on small scale actually [i]increased[/i] the numbers of crustaceans and [i]increased[/i] the available food supply to the food chain in a study into dredging conducted in the USA. Conveniently that sort of information is dismissed when conducting an environmental review, along with many other tactics such as flood and storm damage labeled as man made, and reporting of protected species sightings in areas that the species does not occupy. Both tactics were employed by the crazy green groups calling themselves "environmentalists" during the period leading up to the decision of a large box ironbark park submission. To be exact at least 4, and perhaps more than a dozen hairy nose wombats were released into the area and reported as native to the area. Those wombats would have suffered horrible deaths, dying of starvation, dehydration or both. It doesn't take too many brains to figure out how they got there, and that they are not natives to the area. Who has ever heard of a wombat digging holes in ground like concrete, or grazing on eucalyptus leaves and bush shrubs? Noone because they couldn't possibly survive in that area. Yet there it was in the submission, multiple individual animals that would be at risk from timber cutting, vegetation removal, and vehicles in the area. Next they'll be telling me they died of turbidity in the water course. Hardly surprising then if submissions contrary to the proposed agenda are targeted to never see the light of day when any and all tactics are used. I actually believe there is little sense in trying to negotiate with them. The surest way home is to go directly to the politician responsible. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Gold Prospecting
Prospecting Rules & Regulations
NSW Highbanking Illegal ..... so what is a Highbanker and Highbanking?
Top