Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Charts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Metal Detectors
Detector Accessories
NF Evolution Coils Reviews
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Prospecting Australia:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dignit" data-source="post: 491342" data-attributes="member: 5167"><p>Hello Nenad</p><p>Can you explain in laymans technical terms how these new DD X-Search coils cut through mineralised ground better than say the Evo mono coils?</p><p>My understanding is that mono coils, in general over recent years, have become more widely used over DDs because of the advanced signal processing of todays GPX detectors and having a full diameter transmit and receive pattern as opposed to a DD which has half the diameter of the same size mono coil, thus having less depth than the mono. </p><p>So Im curious to get a sense of how well the new X-Search DDs will perform in mineralised ground, cutting through the mineralization, and provide more depth even though they have half the transmit pattern of a mono coil. </p><p>There seems to be an obvious trade off of ability to cut through mineralization and transmit/receive diameter and Id like to understand the technical theory so I can make an educated buying decision. Im very eager to buy an X-Search coil but dont want to fork out big bucks and be disappointed.</p><p>There is a real lack of technical info provided by coil manufacturers.</p><p>Thanks so much. Cheers</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dignit, post: 491342, member: 5167"] Hello Nenad Can you explain in laymans technical terms how these new DD X-Search coils cut through mineralised ground better than say the Evo mono coils? My understanding is that mono coils, in general over recent years, have become more widely used over DDs because of the advanced signal processing of todays GPX detectors and having a full diameter transmit and receive pattern as opposed to a DD which has half the diameter of the same size mono coil, thus having less depth than the mono. So Im curious to get a sense of how well the new X-Search DDs will perform in mineralised ground, cutting through the mineralization, and provide more depth even though they have half the transmit pattern of a mono coil. There seems to be an obvious trade off of ability to cut through mineralization and transmit/receive diameter and Id like to understand the technical theory so I can make an educated buying decision. Im very eager to buy an X-Search coil but dont want to fork out big bucks and be disappointed. There is a real lack of technical info provided by coil manufacturers. Thanks so much. Cheers [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Metal Detectors
Detector Accessories
NF Evolution Coils Reviews
Top