Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Charts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Clubs & Associations
Associations
NAPFA General News, Member Information & Updates
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Prospecting Australia:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NAPFA" data-source="post: 242582" data-attributes="member: 2301"><p>A bit more on this one. I think it is a reference to highbanking because in late 2014 NAPFA did a field demo for NPWS with the different types of equipment (highbanker -- 12 volt and petrol, river sluice, bucket concentrator; pan and detector. It was obvious they did not like the pump driven highbanker. Please note this is not a discussion about highbanking good or bad; and I note that you point out that under the regulations mechanical methods are not allowed (even though some will interpret that differently). NAPFA did a detailed sumbmission on highbanking in mid last year and you can find it on our website. Inclusion of "mechanical sluicing" reference in this policy probably reflects a lack of understanding on NPWS side; but I am sure that Dept Resources and Energy will be letting them know that. Your other points about negative scenario is absolutely right and we will point it out.</p><p></p><p>cheers</p><p></p><p>stephen.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NAPFA, post: 242582, member: 2301"] A bit more on this one. I think it is a reference to highbanking because in late 2014 NAPFA did a field demo for NPWS with the different types of equipment (highbanker -- 12 volt and petrol, river sluice, bucket concentrator; pan and detector. It was obvious they did not like the pump driven highbanker. Please note this is not a discussion about highbanking good or bad; and I note that you point out that under the regulations mechanical methods are not allowed (even though some will interpret that differently). NAPFA did a detailed sumbmission on highbanking in mid last year and you can find it on our website. Inclusion of "mechanical sluicing" reference in this policy probably reflects a lack of understanding on NPWS side; but I am sure that Dept Resources and Energy will be letting them know that. Your other points about negative scenario is absolutely right and we will point it out. cheers stephen. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Clubs & Associations
Associations
NAPFA General News, Member Information & Updates
Top