Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Charts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Metal Detectors
Minelab
GPZ vs 5000 & Evo coils on a deep target
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Prospecting Australia:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="davent" data-source="post: 334949" data-attributes="member: 6002"><p>One of the reasons I bought a QED, was I thought that because it dosnt have the timings, Normal, enhance etc etc, it would always be in "Normal" giving it a possible depth advantage over the Minelabs. Am yet to prove it, as conditions have not allowed me to give it test on suitable ground, but that should change shortly, I will run some tests with a 20" advantage in hot ground, QED v GPX 4500, same coil, same target, same day etc.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="davent, post: 334949, member: 6002"] One of the reasons I bought a QED, was I thought that because it dosnt have the timings, Normal, enhance etc etc, it would always be in "Normal" giving it a possible depth advantage over the Minelabs. Am yet to prove it, as conditions have not allowed me to give it test on suitable ground, but that should change shortly, I will run some tests with a 20" advantage in hot ground, QED v GPX 4500, same coil, same target, same day etc. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Metal Detectors
Minelab
GPZ vs 5000 & Evo coils on a deep target
Top