Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Charts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Metal Detectors
Minelab
Gpx 6000 compared to gpx 4500 depth on bigger nuggets
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Prospecting Australia:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mbasko" data-source="post: 669285" data-attributes="member: 4485"><p>I think the views on questions like this are highly subjective at best.</p><p>There are also too many other variables, besides opinion, that can come into play with an accurate answer.</p><p>There were some videos around awhile back showing the 6000 definitely holding it's own on test bed sites but again they can be viewed as subjective & lots of variables.</p><p>My own personal opinion is that I don't feel I'm losing much, if any, depth at all with the 6000 v the 4500 with small (up to ~11") coils. </p><p>Although I haven't used it a lot I'm not entirely convinced on the 6000's 17" coil depth though & feel this is where the 4500 may still hold an advantage. Also a much better large coil selection for the 4500 meaning more versatility in detecting at depth ATM.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mbasko, post: 669285, member: 4485"] I think the views on questions like this are highly subjective at best. There are also too many other variables, besides opinion, that can come into play with an accurate answer. There were some videos around awhile back showing the 6000 definitely holding it's own on test bed sites but again they can be viewed as subjective & lots of variables. My own personal opinion is that I don't feel I'm losing much, if any, depth at all with the 6000 v the 4500 with small (up to ~11") coils. Although I haven't used it a lot I'm not entirely convinced on the 6000's 17" coil depth though & feel this is where the 4500 may still hold an advantage. Also a much better large coil selection for the 4500 meaning more versatility in detecting at depth ATM. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Metal Detectors
Minelab
Gpx 6000 compared to gpx 4500 depth on bigger nuggets
Top