Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Charts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Gold Prospecting
Prospecting Equipment
Gold Rat 888 or 6 " bushwalker
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Prospecting Australia:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="choofa" data-source="post: 579741" data-attributes="member: 11476"><p>Hi All, </p><p></p><p>Lookong at in getting a sluice and interested in any experience or comments, especially between the 2 goldrat models 888 and 6 "bushwalker.</p><p></p><p>I have one of the mini sluices and impressed at how well the mini dream mat cells work even on such a small device, but it needs a lot more emptying out. </p><p></p><p>Ideally I would like a sluice that's usable as multi purpose, easy to carry, lightweight, and not to bulky for transport and could be set up as a clean up sluice if needed as well.</p><p></p><p> I like the idea of the 888 with the optional forward classifier, but the 6 "bushwalker looks very good and was wondering if its a better choice as bit more compact, perhaps better for low flow or clean up, or is the 888 a better 'all rounder" and can do it better?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="choofa, post: 579741, member: 11476"] Hi All, Lookong at in getting a sluice and interested in any experience or comments, especially between the 2 goldrat models 888 and 6 "bushwalker. I have one of the mini sluices and impressed at how well the mini dream mat cells work even on such a small device, but it needs a lot more emptying out. Ideally I would like a sluice that's usable as multi purpose, easy to carry, lightweight, and not to bulky for transport and could be set up as a clean up sluice if needed as well. I like the idea of the 888 with the optional forward classifier, but the 6 "bushwalker looks very good and was wondering if its a better choice as bit more compact, perhaps better for low flow or clean up, or is the 888 a better 'all rounder" and can do it better? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Gold Prospecting
Prospecting Equipment
Gold Rat 888 or 6 " bushwalker
Top