Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Charts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Metal Detectors
General Metal Detector Discussion
Garrett ATX vs Minelab GPX5000
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Prospecting Australia:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Heatho" data-source="post: 338477" data-attributes="member: 487"><p>Detecting a small gold nugget in highly mineralised soil is totally different to detecting a gold ring in non goldfields soil. Even the certain shape of some gold makes it difficult to detect. Minelab PI's do the job much better that almost every other detector out there, the only better detector than a minelab PI is a Minelab ZVT detector. :Y: </p><p></p><p>The Garrett will find gold but it will struggle in the harsh mineralised soil of most Aussie goldfields. </p><p></p><p>My 2c.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Heatho, post: 338477, member: 487"] Detecting a small gold nugget in highly mineralised soil is totally different to detecting a gold ring in non goldfields soil. Even the certain shape of some gold makes it difficult to detect. Minelab PI's do the job much better that almost every other detector out there, the only better detector than a minelab PI is a Minelab ZVT detector. :Y: The Garrett will find gold but it will struggle in the harsh mineralised soil of most Aussie goldfields. My 2c. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Metal Detectors
General Metal Detector Discussion
Garrett ATX vs Minelab GPX5000
Top