Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Charts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Metal Detectors
Detector Accessories
Aftermarket Coils for the GPX 6000 - Nugget Finder
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Prospecting Australia:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mbasko" data-source="post: 677665" data-attributes="member: 4485"><p>Speculation being the key word:</p><p></p><p>I'm assuming GemQ has used a bigger coil (Coiltek prototype perhaps <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="😇" title="Smiling face with halo :innocent:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f607.png" data-shortname=":innocent:" /><img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="😉" title="Winking face :wink:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" data-shortname=":wink:" />) & like me hasn't seen any problems using one. </p><p>I was sceptical at first on depth with the 17x13, but after using it a bit more last year, it appears to be ok & has certainly pinged some deep targets for me. </p><p>That's not to say everyone would be happy with it & no doubt there are some people that might find it less than they expected in their area. </p><p>Speculation isn't really helpful though.</p><p>I find the whole "the GPX6000 won't get big or deep gold" banter laughable to be honest as I've pinged some decent bits at good depths. </p><p></p><p>All large coils seem to get a bit of bad feedback at times. There's a lot of people that seem to think by putting on a bigger coil (on any detector) the big, deep gold should just jump out of the ground for them.</p><p>As anyone that's spent time going over areas with a larger coil knows it can be a long & sometimes fruitless process. The big, deep gold isn't always there.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mbasko, post: 677665, member: 4485"] Speculation being the key word: I'm assuming GemQ has used a bigger coil (Coiltek prototype perhaps 😇😉) & like me hasn't seen any problems using one. I was sceptical at first on depth with the 17x13, but after using it a bit more last year, it appears to be ok & has certainly pinged some deep targets for me. That's not to say everyone would be happy with it & no doubt there are some people that might find it less than they expected in their area. Speculation isn't really helpful though. I find the whole "the GPX6000 won't get big or deep gold" banter laughable to be honest as I've pinged some decent bits at good depths. All large coils seem to get a bit of bad feedback at times. There's a lot of people that seem to think by putting on a bigger coil (on any detector) the big, deep gold should just jump out of the ground for them. As anyone that's spent time going over areas with a larger coil knows it can be a long & sometimes fruitless process. The big, deep gold isn't always there. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Metal Detectors
Detector Accessories
Aftermarket Coils for the GPX 6000 - Nugget Finder
Top