❓Your Mineral Identification Questions answered here

Prospecting Australia

Help Support Prospecting Australia:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Thanks one and all - I've been watching now and the bid is $110, And I'm wondering if it's worth a go...My Scottish blood says 'gonnae nae dae tha',' while my English blood says quite the opposite.
 
Feathers12 said:
Hello everyone .I was panning for gold today and I found this stone.I have no idea what it might be.I was hoping someone in this forum might be able to enlighten me thanks?https://www.prospectingaustralia.com/forum/img/member-images/12461/1531649685_img_20180715_182738.jpg

Hi Feathers.

As GR says, it's next to impossible to make a positive ID based on a photo alone in most cases.

All I can say is that the stone in the photo looks a bit like citrine. If it's of faceting quality, citrine can cut a very attractive stone. I've just finished one, will likely put the photo up on the forum this evening.

Cheers
 
Lefty, citrine is quartz and has no cleavage - that looks like it is distinctly cleaved.
1531799151_cleavage_mineral.jpg

The shape of the crystals at its base also look isometric or tetragonal, not trigonal.

1531799191_crystal_unknown.jpg
 
goldierocks said:
Lefty, citrine is quartz and has no cleavage - that looks like it is distinctly cleaved.
https://www.prospectingaustralia.com/forum/img/member-images/4386/1531799151_cleavage_mineral.jpg
The shape of the crystals at its base also look isometric or tetragonal, not trigonal.

https://www.prospectingaustralia.com/forum/img/member-images/4386/1531799191_crystal_unknown.jpg

GR - yeah I know :) I was addressing Feathers photo of the bit he found while gold panning, not the photo of the reddish mineral specimen posted by Mungoman.

Cheers
 
No worries :lol: I probably caused confusion by leaving it until another one had been posted after to make a comment.
 
GR - are you able to translate this info from the Macrostat map into English please? :)

Description: Mudstone, siltstone, sandstone, limestone, chert, basaltic to andesitic flows and pyroclastics and volcaniclastics.

Comments: argillaceous detrital sediment; igneous mafic volcanic; synthesis of multiple published descriptions

Lithology: argillaceous detrital sediment; igneous mafic volcanic

Does this mean that the area in question is a hotch-potch of sedimentary materials and mafic volcanics all rolled in together? Volcanics punched up through sedimentary rocks in some parts of the area?

Also, what's the distinction between pyroclastic and volcaniclastic? It sounds like both were spat from volcanoes.

Cheers
 
First one is interesting... Second looks like it has some Blue/ aqua colour to it Chryscolla( spell check) but it could just be the way the light is in the Background...

LW...
 
pyroclastics are clastic rocks composed solely or primarily of volcanic materials, usually deposited hot from volcanic ash clouds ("ash" is not ash of course, but tiny particles of lava and rock - the same as volcanoes don't produce a lot of what is truly "smoke").

Where the volcanic material has subsequently been transported and reworked through mechanical action, such as by wind or water, these rocks are termed volcaniclastic.

Pyros = fire (as in pyromaniac)

A clast is a particle or fragment.

So the cloud coming out of a volcano can be volcaniclastic. It settles on the ground, is rained upon, washed into lakes and rivers, and becomes a volcaniclastic sediment. Under the microscope pyroclastic rocks commonly contain sharp shards of volcanic glass (which if very hot when they land, weld together to form welded tuff, but often they are too cool). Volcaniclastic rocks show particles which are rounded, and often some that did not come out of a volcano. In outcrop volcaniclastic rocks often show textures related to sorting by water (size grading, scouring, cross-bedding), but pyroclastic rocks (many of which settle to the ground directly from suspension in air) do not.

In extreme cases volcanoes blast pyroclastics 15 km or so upwards - as the ash cloud collapses under gravity it becomes denser and reaches supersonic speed, shooting out horizontally in every direction when it hits the ground. Pyroclastic rocks that formed when Lake Taupo was generated in an eruption two thousand years ago moved in a cloud at supersonic speed and covered virtually the entire North Island of NZ, wiping out most plants and animals (it coloured the sky in China). There are other terms that we use (eg lahar = mud flow) which is volcaniclastic material made of originally pyroclastic material that has turned to mud and washed down the slope of a volcano, often rapidly with devastating results for villages below.
 
Lefty said:
GR - are you able to translate this info from the Macrostat map into English please? :)

Description: Mudstone, siltstone, sandstone, limestone, chert, basaltic to andesitic flows and pyroclastics and volcaniclastics.

Comments: argillaceous detrital sediment; igneous mafic volcanic; synthesis of multiple published descriptions

Lithology: argillaceous detrital sediment; igneous mafic volcanic

Does this mean that the area in question is a hotch-potch of sedimentary materials and mafic volcanics all rolled in together? Volcanics punched up through sedimentary rocks in some parts of the area?

Also, what's the distinction between pyroclastic and volcaniclastic? It sounds like both were spat from volcanoes.

Cheers
Since it says flows, probably lava flows interbedded with sedimentary rocks (andesitic can mean intermediate to mafic but basaltic is mafic). I suspect that intrusive rocks would be on a different part of the map legend.
argillaceous = clayey
detrital (as in debris) = clastic sedimentary, consisting of individual grains (as distinct from chemical sedimentary like some carbonate rocks and cherts)

detritus
[dtrds]

NOUN
waste or debris of any kind.
"streets filled with rubble and detritus"

Sorry, missed that part of the question....
 
Thanks again GR :Y: That does look sort of like what I was looking at with my own eyes.

I suspect that intrusive rocks would be on a different part of the map legend.

Yes, the two areas are adjoining one another on the map. The varied felsic intrusives run for some distance and look to be obviously part of the largely granitic-type mountain ranges that make up large parts of our area. Further out again, that gives way to pure granite.

Wherever I click on the map in the region I live, the word "igneous" usually pops up. Within a circular are about 100km in diameter the geology consists of a hotch-potch of intrusives: Hornblende quartz diorite, hornblende-biotite tonalite, biotite-hornblende granodiorite, local olivine-hornblende-augite gabbro, hornblende-biotite granite - Leucocratic biotite syenogranite - tonalite, diorite, granodiorite, granite, monzogranite, rhyolite, microgranodiorite - Layered troctolite, olivine-augite gabbro, biotite-hornblende-augite leucogabbro, ferrigabbro, anorthosite, clinopyroxenite, syenite dykes - etc,etc, too many to keep naming and...

extrusives: Olivine basalt, pyroxene andesite - rhyolitic ignimbrite, Rhyolitic, andesitic and trachytic volcanics, sandstone, shale - Aphyric to porphyritic dacite, locally flow banded and autobrecciated; welded crystal-poor dacitic ignimbrite - Basalt, andesite and related volcaniclastic rocks - and so on.

Must have been a hot, noisy place in ancient history.
 
Hello All
I've been trying to find out more about the thread like formation in attached microscope view which is 2 Sqmm. The rock comes from SE Queensland from a fault system.
Some threads look like copper but the second type is whitish yellow "fibre like" made of thinner stands. Its not organic as I have broken the rock in multiple cleavages and it is present throughout the rock. Is there a term to describe this formation as I havent been able to find out anything on the web.
Any idea on what mineral it could be?
Does copper present this way?
I have found a sample of Cuprite in the area as well


1533026421_img_6273.jpg

1533026422_img_6288.jpg
 
Pretty impossible without an even more detailed image, which I realise is very difficult. I would have thought organic.
 
Top