.Outback said:Gee this is getting to the stage of Who can find the least $ buck value micro nugget using an expensive detector
If that is what you like doing then all power to you ! :/
Now for those who seek to actually make a quid from prospecting ' you would be better off using a pan & sieve looking for the spots were fine gold has accumulated .
Natural traps can hold ounces within a few buckets of material , , especially in desert gold fields .
All that fine gold is still beyond any detector .
You might pickup on some ground variation through the threshold of any quick changes but the SDC wouldn't be ideal for tracking it as it works well in highly mineralised ground to null it out.silver said:I now pose a question ,... could the SDC find dust in accumulation by tracing the black sand signals(best of both worlds then) ? That way the smallest it could lead you to would be fine dust, or, is this beyond the scope of the SDC ?
Just a question from a humble treasure hunter.
How deep was the .05 piece ?BigWave said:
Tim said::lol: Ta BW. The bruises on my forehead from banging it on a brick wall have finally healed, but the elephant is still in the room here, methinks. So I will endeavor to limit my blunt statements of the obvious to specific and relevant topics.BigWave said:
Top stuff Jwal. Surfing a few other sites I found some guff about using an earlier Goldmaster(concentric elliptical) coil on my GMT to further enhance its'ability finding them small bits- I'm still a ML orphan..... 8.(
Full credit to you blokes here. You sure are world class masters of the beepa.
