Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Charts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Metal Detectors
General Metal Detector Discussion
Garrett ATX vs Minelab GPX5000
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Prospecting Australia:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Zakman" data-source="post: 38420" data-attributes="member: 1440"><p>Yes I agree Duck, we need time but as Garrets are a large company its crazy that their marketing of this product is sooo poor. Obviously there are some major issues which would blow the market wide open for them if this detector was actually as good as we all hope it is. </p><p></p><p>If this was our company and we knew that the GPX was the market leader.</p><p> </p><p></p><p>I go to WA a highly mineralization ground and video my finds showing clearly depth of detection and ground balance then explain the technical side of the DD over the mono as referred to by Heatho in the post above, then show how compact it is and versatile in coin, beach and relic finds. This would blow the market wide open. Which would force Minelab to reduce priced ASAP.</p><p></p><p>But IF my product was only as good as the Minelab CTX plus with a frequent change so that its was able to gold detection </p><p>to an average depth. </p><p></p><p>I would do exactly as they have, little technical info some basic utubes and leave the rush to "hearsay" and peoples wishes for a cheaper high quality detector.</p><p></p><p>To top up my cash flow I would delay the release of some extras like coils and cover to bring in some extra cash as the market sales slow. </p><p> </p><p>So lets see what the results really are in time. </p><p></p><p>I've just canceled my order <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite3" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":(" /></p><p></p><p>Chat Soon.</p><p></p><p>Zakman</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Zakman, post: 38420, member: 1440"] Yes I agree Duck, we need time but as Garrets are a large company its crazy that their marketing of this product is sooo poor. Obviously there are some major issues which would blow the market wide open for them if this detector was actually as good as we all hope it is. If this was our company and we knew that the GPX was the market leader. I go to WA a highly mineralization ground and video my finds showing clearly depth of detection and ground balance then explain the technical side of the DD over the mono as referred to by Heatho in the post above, then show how compact it is and versatile in coin, beach and relic finds. This would blow the market wide open. Which would force Minelab to reduce priced ASAP. But IF my product was only as good as the Minelab CTX plus with a frequent change so that its was able to gold detection to an average depth. I would do exactly as they have, little technical info some basic utubes and leave the rush to "hearsay" and peoples wishes for a cheaper high quality detector. To top up my cash flow I would delay the release of some extras like coils and cover to bring in some extra cash as the market sales slow. So lets see what the results really are in time. I've just canceled my order :( Chat Soon. Zakman [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Metal Detectors
General Metal Detector Discussion
Garrett ATX vs Minelab GPX5000
Top